Games in Preference Form and Preference Rationalizability
نویسندگان
چکیده
We introduce a game in preference form, which consists of a game form and a preference structure, and define preference rationalizability that allows for each player’s ex-post preferences over outcomes to depend on opponents’ actions. We show that preference rationalizability is invariant to redundant types and states as long as all players have simplex restrictions on their ex-post preferences. We analyze the relationship between preference-form games and conventional payoff-form games. In particular, even if all players have simplex restrictions, we argue that there are multiple payoff-form games that correspond to a given preference-form game, and show that only one of them has the set of interim correlated rationalizable actions equal to the set of preference rationalizable actions in the preference-form game. We also discuss cases where the simplex assumption is violated.
منابع مشابه
The Complexity of Nash Rationalizability
The observed choices of a set of players interacting in various related games are said to be Nash rationalizable if there exist preferences for the players that make those choices the pure strategy Nash equilibria for each game. We provide an intuitive characterization of Nash rationalizability under less restrictive conditions than those in the existing literature, and show that this restricte...
متن کاملSequential and quasi-perfect rationalizability in extensive games
Within an epistemic model for two-player extensive games, we formalize the event that each player believes that his opponent chooses rationally at all information sets. Letting this event be common certain belief yields the concept of sequential rationalizability. Adding preference for cautious behavior to this event likewise yields the concept of quasi-perfect rationalizability. These concepts...
متن کاملPreference, Rationalizability and Equilibrium
In the context of finite normal form games, this paper addresses the formalization and implications of the hypothesis that players are rational and that this is common knowledge. The innovation is to admit notions of rationality other than subjective expected utility maximization. For example, rationality can be defined by the alternative restrictions that preferences are probabilistically soph...
متن کاملAlgorithms for cautious reasoning in games∗
We provide comparable algorithms for the Dekel-Fudenberg procedure, iterated admissibility and proper rationalizability by means of the concepts of preference restrictions and likelihood orderings. We apply the algorithms for comparing iterated admissibility and proper rationalizability, and provide a sufficient condition under which iterated admissibility does not rule out properly rationaliza...
متن کاملOn randomized rationality
In contrast to the traditional notion of rationalizability of stochastic choice which requires the preference relations to be strict, we propose a notion of rationalizability without requiring the preference relations to be strict. Our definition is based on the simple hypothesis of a two stage choice process: stage (i) a preference relation R is drawn according to a probability assignment; sta...
متن کامل